Palmowski, Lars and Nowak, Hartmuth and Witowski, Andrea and Koos, Björn and Wolf, Alexander and Weber, Maike and Kleefisch, Daniel and Unterberg, Matthias and Haberl, Helge and von Busch, Alexander and Ertmer, Christian and Zarbock, Alexander and Bode, Christian and Putensen, Christian and Limper, Ulrich and Wappler, Frank and Köhler, Thomas and Henzler, Dietrich and Oswald, Daniel and Ellger, Björn and Ehrentraut, Stefan F. and Bergmann, Lars and Rump, Katharina and Ziehe, Dominik and Babel, Nina and Sitek, Barbara and Marcus, Katrin and Frey, Ulrich H. and Thoral, Patrick J. and Adamzik, Michael and Eisenacher, Martin and Rahmel, Tim and Lazzeri, Chiara (2024) Assessing SOFA score trajectories in sepsis using machine learning: A pragmatic approach to improve the accuracy of mortality prediction. PLOS ONE, 19 (3). e0300739. ISSN 1932-6203
journal.pone.0300739.pdf
Download (1MB)
Abstract
Introduction
An increasing amount of longitudinal health data is available on critically ill septic patients in the age of digital medicine, including daily sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score measurements. Thus, the assessment in sepsis focuses increasingly on the evaluation of the individual disease’s trajectory. Machine learning (ML) algorithms may provide a promising approach here to improve the evaluation of daily SOFA score dynamics. We tested whether ML algorithms can outperform the conventional ΔSOFA score regarding the accuracy of 30-day mortality prediction.
Methods
We used the multicentric SepsisDataNet.NRW study cohort that prospectively enrolled 252 sepsis patients between 03/2018 and 09/2019 for training ML algorithms, i.e. support vector machine (SVM) with polynomial kernel and artificial neural network (aNN). We used the Amsterdam UMC database covering 1,790 sepsis patients for external and independent validation.
Results
Both SVM (AUC 0.84; 95% CI: 0.71–0.96) and aNN (AUC 0.82; 95% CI: 0.69–0.95) assessing the SOFA scores of the first seven days led to a more accurate prognosis of 30-day mortality compared to the ΔSOFA score between day 1 and 7 (AUC 0.73; 95% CI: 0.65–0.80; p = 0.02 and p = 0.05, respectively). These differences were even more prominent the shorter the time interval considered. Using the SOFA scores of day 1 to 3 SVM (AUC 0.82; 95% CI: 0.68 0.95) and aNN (AUC 0.80; 95% CI: 0.660.93) led to a more accurate prognosis of 30-day mortality compared to the ΔSOFA score (AUC 0.66; 95% CI: 0.58–0.74; p < 0.01 and p < 0.01, respectively). Strikingly, all these findings could be confirmed in the independent external validation cohort.
Conclusions
The ML-based algorithms using daily SOFA scores markedly improved the accuracy of mortality compared to the conventional ΔSOFA score. Therefore, this approach could provide a promising and automated approach to assess the individual disease trajectory in sepsis. These findings reflect the potential of incorporating ML algorithms as robust and generalizable support tools on intensive care units.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Subjects: | STM Open Academic > Biological Science |
Depositing User: | Unnamed user with email admin@eprint.stmopenacademic.com |
Date Deposited: | 05 Apr 2024 11:07 |
Last Modified: | 05 Apr 2024 11:07 |
URI: | http://publish.sub7journal.com/id/eprint/2096 |